Science and the Bible have seemed to be battling each other
since the days of Darwin and molecules to man evolution. I have met many that aren't too concerned
about whether the Bible and science agree. But the top story of NewScientist
this week might catch their attention in a new way.
"Falling meteor may have changed the course of
Christianity." What does this
headline mean? William Hartmann ,
co-founder of the Planetary Science Institute,
suggests that the bright light from heaven that the Apostle Paul
witnessed at his conversion could be similar to the fireball meteor that was seen in Chelyabinsk,
Russia in 2013.
Check out the video below. Watch
up until 1:20 and then jump to 6:10-7:24.
Hartmann believes the voice Paul heard could have been the
explosion, and the shock wave could have knocked them all to the ground.
Before continuing, read the following accounts recorded in
the Bible. Acts 9:1-19, 22:1-21, 26:1-22
One of my favorite books "Children of God"
Just because the events may look similar on the outside, it
does not mean that that is what happened. First of all, a light from heaven does not
need to be explained in a "natural" sense. God is the light (John 8:12, 12:35, 1 Peter 2:9, Rev. 21:23).
The presence of God has always been referred to as or being accompanied by light. At the transfiguration (Matt. 17:1-13) the
disciples saw this on display. Verse two
describes, "There he was
transfigured before them. His face shone
like the sun, and his cloths became as white as the light".
Paul makes it clear in His testimony that it was Jesus who
was speaking to him. It should come as
no surprise that the resurrected and ascended Jesus would choose to show Himself in light.
Jesus also made it clear that not all who heard Him could
understand what He was saying(Luke 8:10). The message that Paul received that day was not one for all to understand. God has the capability of opening the ears of
some and not others.
Lastly, shock waves
do not need to be present for people to fall to the ground. Just the light itself would be enough
to make me fall to the ground in fear and wonder.
As Christians we need to be on guard when others try to
explain away the miraculous acts of God, in human terms. Speculation is not truth.
If Christians doubt the miraculous of God in calling Paul to
the mission of preaching the gospel to the Gentiles, what else could they
doubt? Believing Hartmann's "scientific"
view could encourage people to doubt the miraculous of Christ's work or even the
resurrection.
Science always points towards the beauty and
power of God, it never takes away from it.
Resources: NewScientist, Daily Mail